
SUBTEXT
Beginning in 15th century Italy and spreading northward, it became the fashion in portraiture to identify the sitter,his rank and age in gold paint within the painting itself. At a time when portraits were exchanged by the nobility to cement political and marital alliances, these attributions were accepted as an acknowledgement of authentic likeness (although Henry the Vlll was famously enraged by the discrepancy between Holbein’s ‘Anne of Cleves’ and Anne herself).
During the 19th Century, photography rendered such niceties irrelevant, but recent developments in image enhancement and contortion have taught us to think twice about what we think we see.
I’ve subverted the convention here. In an age when a photograph is no longer a guarantee of an accurate representation, perhaps portraiture will become the more revealing form. Here the subtext conveys my sense of the reality that underlies the image and contrasts with its often grand, formal title.
The subtext, painted in transparent gold that floats on the surface of the canvas, can’t be seen in reproduction, so I’ve provided it in italic beneath the formal title.
|